Kenali Syaitan & Iblis Di Sekeliling Kamu...!

Syaitan telah membahagikan tugas-tugas tertentu kepada ketua-ketua mereka yang tertentu pula.


1 - Qarin – mendampingi manusia sejak lahir lagi bagi mengajak, merayu dan menipu supaya menyimpang jauh dari jalan yang diredhai Allah.

2 - al Wilhan – menggoda dan mengganggu manusia sedang wudhuk.

3 - al Hinzab – mengganggu manusia sedang solat.

4 - Thibr - bertugas khusus untuk membinasakan manusia.

5 - Awar - menggoda manusia untuk melakukan zina.

6 - Mabsut – membisikkan manusia supaya berdusta.

7 - Dasim – Bertugas semata-mata menjadikan supaya manusia bersengketa dengan keluarga.

8 - Zalanbur - Bertugas dipasar-pasar membisikkan dan memberansang manusia supaya melakukan penipuan semasa menjula beli.

9 - Nik Najis - Bertugas memperalatkan agama dan menjual syurga demi politik tuhan DAPig nya.

10 - Anwar Ibrahim - Bertugas untuk mengajak pemuda, pemudi, lelaki, pompuan, jantan, gay, pelacur, semuanya lah untuk menyokong dia jadi PM ...!


Gila Ke apa? Lu Fikir La Sendiri!!!


PUTRA MERDEKA 
Jumaat, 23 Disember 2011

Hasrat DAP Kurangkan Penjawat Awam Bila Berkuasa

Hasrat DAP kurangkan penjawat awam tidak wajar

LUMUT - Hasrat DAP untuk mengurangkan bilangan kakitangan awam sekiranya dipilih sebagai pemerintah negara adalah satu tindakan tidak wajar dan menimbulkan kegusaran dalam kalangan penjawat awam.

Pengerusi Kongres Kesatuan Pekerja Dalam Perkhidmatan Awam (Cuepacs) Negeri Perak, Abdul Jalil Yang berkata, pihaknya mahu cadangan itu ditentang habis-habisan oleh semua penjawat awam.

Menurutnya, selama ini Cuepacs sentiasa memperjuangkan nasib dan kebajikan semua penjawat awam di seluruh negara.

“Jika kakitangan sedia ada pun mereka (DAP) mahu kurangkan bilangannya, bagaimana pula nasib kakitangan kontrak seramai 20,000 hingga 30,000 dalam pelbagai jabatan kerajaan.

“Sedangkan Cuepacs berjuang habis-habisan mendesak kerajaan untuk menyerap mereka sebagai kakitangan tetap dalam perkhidmatan awam,” katanya selepas Majlis Perasmian Kesatuan Sekerja Kumpulan Sokongan Jabatan Perikanan Semenanjung Malaysia (KSKSJPSM) di Pusat Pengembangan Perikanan Kampung Acheh, Sitiawan.

Hadir sama, Presiden Kesatuan Sekerja Lembaga Kemajuan Ikan Malaysia (LKIM) Negeri Perak, Jamaluddin Majid dan Pengerusi Penaja KSKSJPSM, Mazlan Ali.

Sementara itu, Jamaluddin berkata, hasrat tersebut sebenarnya menunjukkan niat tidak baik parti berkenaan selain menunjukkan hasrat sebenar mereka untuk menumbangkan kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN).

“Belum lagi mereka (DAP) memegang kuasa memerintah negara dan nak buat macam-macam cadangan yang nyata sekali mampu menggusarkan ramai pihak, inilah sikap sebenar mereka.

“Kita boleh lihat, mereka mempunyai agenda mereka tersendiri dan seolah-olah terdapat unsur perkauman kerana hampir 80 peratus penjawat awam terdiri dalam kalangan Bumiputera,” katanya.

Tambah Jamaluddin lagi, isu tersebut diharap dapat membuka mata segelintir penjawat awam yang selamanya ini terpengaruh dengan pelbagai tohmahan pembangkang sekali gus menjadi penyokong tegar pembangkang.

Oleh : Wartawan Sinar Harian
10 November 2011

7 Wasiat Raja-Raja Melayu

GTPuteri 
Selasa, 27 September 2011

Siapa Sebenarnya DALANG Di Sebalik PERISTIWA 16 SEPTEMBER ? ... Final Story!

Pagi, 13 Ogos 2011 merupakan pagi yang ditunggu-tunggu GWM untuk menyambut ketibaan sahabat lama yang masih bergiat aktif dalam parti PKR.

Sudah terlalu lama GWM ingin bersemuka dan bertanya khabar rakan seperjuangan sewaktu zaman reformasi tahun 1998. Pertemuan jam 3.30 pagi, bersahur di Kampung Baru cukup mengimbau kenangan lama dalam satu saf reformasi.

Pertemuan yang ditunggu-tunggu GWM

Walaupun masing-masing mengubah haluan sendiri, persahabatan masih kekal terjalin sehingga ke hari ini. GWM sememangnya mahu ketemu teman lama kerana masih ada satu persoalan dalam benak yang belum terjawab dengan harapan akan terungkai dan dijawab oleh sahabat.

Siapa DALANG Di Sebalik PERISTIWA 16 SEPTEMBER? ... Itulah pertanyaan politik pertama dan terakhir GWM kepadanya. Dan jawapan yang diberikan sudahpun GWM agak sejak dari tahun 2009. Jangkaan, telahan dan penyelidikan yang dilakukan selama ini ternyata benar.

ANWAR IBRAHIM dan ABDULLAH BADAWI! Kedua-duanya terlibat secara langsung dalam memainkan peranan pertukaran kerajaan secara songsang. Modus operandi ini disusun dengan cantik dan rapi seolah-olah hanya Anwar Ibrahim yang melakukannya seorang diri, sejak dari tahun 2008 lagi!

Semuanya tampak bermula sebulan sebelum berlakunya pertemuan dua mata diantara Anwar Ibrahim dan Pak Lah. Dan pertemuan di Madrasah Nurul Iman Hulu Langat menoktahkan firasat GWM selama ini.

Apa Anwar Ibrahim katakan mengenai pertemuan beliau dengan Pak Lah dalam entri blognya ...

Pertemuan yang kononnya dikatakan tidak disengajakan di antara Pak Lah dan Anwar (seperti yang didakwa Anwar Ibrahim) merupakan pembohongan paling besar dalam sejarah orang Melayu.

Pertemuan selama 20 minit sebenarnya kerisauan Anwar Ibrahim jika DS Najib diangkat menjadi Perdana Menteri. Anwar sememangnya tidak mahu DS Najib menjawat jawatan keramat tersebut.

Anwar Ibrahim mempertikaikan keputusan mengapa perlu DS Najib ditabal menjadi Perdana Menteri, mengapa Pak Lah boleh menyerahkan silver platter kepada DS Najib. Pak Lah berkata tiada apa yang boleh dilakukannya lagi.

Kedua-dua kutu berahak bercakap tentang keperluan untuk 'menyelamatkan negara' ini dan bersetuju untuk mengekalkan talian komunikasi terbuka di antara mereka. Dan kerana itulah masih lagi terdapat cikaro dan barua Anwar Ibrahim berlegar-legar didalam UMNO ... sehingga ke hari ini ... report duty to Anwar Ibrahim!

Anwar bijak meletakkan ramai cikaro dan baruanya dalam UMNO, survival masa depannya masih dalam UMNO. Anwar hanya boleh berkuasa menjadi Perdana Menteri melalui UMNO! Juak-juak pembangkang boleh bertanya kepadanya ... apa nombor keahlian Anwar Ibrahim dalam PKR? ... Tadak Bro! No ahli UMNO ada la ...

Cikaro dan barua Anwar telah lama menjadi duri dalam daging UMNO sejak Pak Lah berkuasa menjadi Perdana Menteri. Cikaro dan barua Anwar inilah yang masih lagi bertugas menyusahkan tugas DS Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri dengan pelbagai strategi politik yang bakal menjahanamkan karier DS Najib!

Namun ini adalah second attempt Anwar Ibrahim bersekongkol dengan Pak Lah untuk bergelar Perdana Menteri! Bila pula masanya berlaku first attempt Pak Lah memberi kemenangan dan laluan percuma untuk Anwar Ibrahim menjadi Perdana Menteri?

Waktu Imsak Kian Hampir ...

GWM masih kurang berpuas hati dengan penjelasan sahabat, peristiwa pertemuan Pak Lah dan Anwar Ibrahim berlaku pada tahun 2009. Apa kena-mengena dengan modus operandi yang telah lama disusun sejak 2008? Dimana kaitannya? Jauh perbezaan diantara 2008 dan 2009.

Dan sahabat memberi penjelasan yang boleh disifatkan logik menurut hukum akal ... Kenaikan harga minyak petrol dan diesel bulan Jun 2008 ... ini adalah first attempt dan perancangan awal Anwar dan Pak Lah untuk menaikkan kemarahan rakyat terhadap UMNO!

Mengapa GWM mengatakan logik mengikut hukum akal? ... Masih ingat lagi dengan kenyataan Ezam Mohd Noor dalam pengakuannya mengapa beliau masuk UMNO? ...

Tidak sampai selang masa beberapa hari selepas Ezam memberi kenyataan akhbar pada 1 Jun 2008, ... 4 Jun 2008 ... Malaysia dikejutkan dengan kenaikan harga minyak petrol dan diesel yang tidak masuk akal, atas nama kenaikan harga minyak di pasaran dunia!

Menurut sahabat GWM, telah berlaku pertemuan sulit empat mata diantara Pak Lah dan Anwar Ibrahim dalam perancangan political acqusition strategy untuk memudahkan Anwar Ibrahim diangkat sebagai Perdana Menteri.

Pak Lah sememangnya telah menyediakan carpet merah untuk Anwar Ibrahim bergelar next Prime Minister ... modus operandi paling mudah menaikkan kemarahan rakyat, dngan kenaikan harga minyak!

Kebetulan? Teori Konspirasi? ... Lu Fikirlah sendiri ...

Kalau Pak Lah dan Anwar Ibrahim boleh melakukan talian komunikasi terbuka, GWM juga ada talian komunikasi terbuka dengan sahabat lama! Keep the backdoor channel open! Cuma ... talian ini 'one way'! maklumat mengenai gerakan pembangkang kepada GWM.

Waktu Imsak semakin hampir, kopi dah bergelas-gelas, rokok dah berkotak-kotak, tiba masanya untuk beredar, berpelukan dan bersalam ...

Lawan tetap lawan ... namun jangan diputuskan silaturrahim sekalipun berada diantara dua kem politik yang berbeza. Jumpa lagi sahabat ...

Pssst ... Pak Lah dan Anwar! Lu dua orang memang tidak boleh dipercayai ... Pengkhianat! ... Musuh Dalam Selimut!

Gelombang Wangsa Maju
Jumaat, 16 September 2011

HIMPUNAN KATA-KATA MENGARUT NIK AZIZ

1. "Kita bersyukur dengan pendirian DAP sekarang, kerana mereka sudah berubah sikap dan sanggup bekerjasama dengan PAS, asalkan tidak mendirikan negara Islam" - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian 12 Mei 1999.

2. "Bukan sahaja dalam menifesto, dalam perlembagaan PAS sendiri memang tidak mengandungi satu perkataan pun untuk menubuhkan sebuah negara Islam, dia (DAP) boleh tengok sendiri dan baca perlembagaan itu." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 4 Ogos 2001.

3. "Terdapat unsur kafir dalam UMNO kerana parti itu menolak Islam dalam pentadbiran negara, UMNO juga ada ciri kafir" - Ceramah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Padang Tembak, Pengkalan Chepa, 3 Julai 1999.

4. "Jika melawan UMNO tiba-tiba meninggal dunia, maka kita dikira mati syahid." - Kuliah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Masjid Kg Pulau Melaka.

5. "Allah sendiri gunakan perkataan memaki, mencemuh atau mencarut, jadi manusia sendiri berpeluang menggunakan maki hamun, tapi terserahlah kepada manusia di mana tempatnya." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 28 April 1999.

6. "Siapa yang nak tolong kerajaan Islam, kami sebagai pemimpin Islam mesti terima sama ada DAP, MCA, dan MIC. Kalau nak tolong mengapa kita tolak. Jika DAP ikhlas nak tolong PAS, saya terima. Usahkan DAP, syaitan pun boleh saya terima." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 24 Januari 1999.

7. "Orang-orang Islam yang berkongsi dengan orang-orang kafir untuk memerintah negara, menjadi kafir atau haram" - Hukum Dewan Ulama PAS Kelantan, Ogos 1963.

8. "Islam tidak melarang umatnya mengeluarkan perkataan mencarut dan mencaci seseorang jika kena pada tempat dan masanya, kerana ia sudah menjadi salah satu naluri." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 29 April 1999.

9. "Kelantan menggunakan hasil cukai arak, lesen anjing dan sebagainya bagi menampung kos membuat jalan dan lain-lain projek pembagunan. Arak itu sendiri boleh diminum oleh bukan Islam, jadi bila minum oleh mereka, maka untuk menjaga keselamatan, kerajaan mengambil duit dari mana?" - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 26 November 1994.

10. "Bagi penjualan arak, ia hanya dibenar jual oleh orang bukan Islam kepada golongan itu sahaja, kerana jika ia diharamkan sudah tentu menyulitkan orang bukan Islam untuk menikmatinya." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 19 November 1992.

11. "PAS Sedia gugur slogan negara Islam, jadi untuk mencari perdamaian itu, setakat mana yang boleh kita hendak kepada Islam, tapi kalau nampak menyusahkan tak apa..." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 25 Jun 1999.

12. "Menentang PAS adalah Haram mengikut al-Quran." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Minggu, 24 April 1994.

13. "Tidak ada orang yang berhak menjaga dunia ini, kecuali orang yang belajar ilmu agama Islam." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 17 April 1995.

14. "Tiada sesiapa di muka bumi ini yang tahu menjaga dunia termasuk menguruskan soal budaya, ekonomi serta harta benda, melainkan ulama." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 6 November 1999.

15. "Saya di antara orang yang cukup kuat menyokong untuk meluaskan keahlian PAS ini kepada orang bukan Islam." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Kota Bharu, 1999.

16. "PAS boleh terima pemimpin DAP jadi Perdana Menteri, tidak ada apa, asalkan dia terima syarat yang ditetapkan oleh Barisan Alternatif." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 6 November 1999.

17. "Para imam hendaklah faham bahawa ada anak-anak mukim tidak mahu menuruti imam yang beraqidah politik suku, agama suku, kerana boleh menyebabkan sembahyang tidak sah." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Harakah, 4 Mac 2001.

18. "Tafsiran negara Islam yang dikehendaki oleh PAS sebenarnya sudah terkandung dalam Manifesto Barisan Alternatif (BA) yang dikemukakan pada pilihanraya yang ke-10 itu." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Harakah 1-15 Ogos 2001.

19. "Ini penting kerana kita juga mahukan sokongan dan undi bukan Islam dalam usaha memenangi pilihanraya umum akan datang" - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Ucapan di Muktamar Dewan Pemuda PAS ke-31, Petaling Jaya, 24 Mei 2004.

20. "Negara kita Malaysia belum merdeka lagi kerana perlembagaannya masih perlembagaan kafir."- Khutbah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Masjid Pengadang Baru, Marang, Oktober 2001.

21. “Jika ada parti lain yang menentang kepimpinan PAS yang menjalankan pemerintahan cara Islam, ia adalah haram.” – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Harakah, 23 April 1994.

22. “Memang ada lagi persefahaman antara PAS dengan Malaikat, sebab itulah APU (Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah) memerintah lagi (di Kelantan)”. –Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 27 April 1995.

23. “Kerajaan PAS Kelantan akan mengkaji kemungkinan melarang wanita bekerja. Tidak adil membiarkan wanita, kerana lelaki dari segi fitrahnya mempunyai tanggungjawab mencari nafkah bagi menanggung kehidupan keluarga.” – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, 16 Mac 1999 di Kota Baharu.

24. “Ya Allah, aku mohon butakan mata pengundi-pengundi hantu supaya mereka tidak Nampak simbol lain kecuali simbol PAS. “ – Doa Nik Aziz Nik Mat pada 27 Mei 1999 diaminkan oleh kira-kira 3000 penyokong beliau dalam satu majlis makan malam dan cerah PAS di Sungai Bakut, Nibong Tebal.

25. “UMNO tetap parti sekular kerana asas perlembagaanya tidak merujuk al-Quran dan Hadis.” – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Harakah, 22 Februari 1999.

26. ‘‘Tiada sebab langsung orang Islam tolak Islam. Islam yang dibawa oleh UMNO ini Islam kacukan, Islam plastik. Macam duit palsu, ubat palsu, makanan palsu. Ini Islam palsu yang dibawa UMNO. Islam ini tidak boleh bawa ke akhirat, tidak boleh bawa ke syurga, dia boleh bawa dekat pintu kubur. Bertengkar atas muka tak habis-habis dengan Melayu sendiri boleh bertengkar.’’ – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Rakaman Audio di Sidang Akhbar di Pulau Pinang pada 17 Ogos 2009.

27. “Jika Nabi Muhammad boleh menandatangani perjanjian dengan musuh tradisi Islam, iaitu kaum Yahudi, sebaik tiba di Madinah, PAS juga sanggup bekerjasama dengan DAP.” – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 12 Mei 1999

28. "Percaya-ae (kepercayaan) manusiyo (manusia) kepada kiamat menyebabkan seganah-ganah (seganas-ganas) manusia akan tok (tak) jadi ganah. Kerana dia yakin walau bagaimana ganahnya aku dan bagaimana pangkat... tingginya pangkat aku, tapi apalah nasib aku apabila aku berdepae (berdepan) dengan padang mahsyar. Di padang mahsyar kelak ada lagi yang lebih gagah daripada aku namanya Allah Subhanahuwataala. Ada lagi yang lebih jabaruut, lebih samseng daripada aku iaitu Allah Subhanahuwataala. Ada lagi yang lebih angkuh daripada aku iaitu Allah Subhanahuwataala. Dan nama Allah Subhanahuwataala satu daripada namanya al-Mutakabbir, al-Jabbarul Mutakabbir. (Al-Jabbar maknanya gagah kuasa ataupun kita panggil samseng. Al-Mutakabbir sombong, angkuh.) Akulah oghaenya (orangnya) sombong, tok denga (dengar) kato (kata) orang lain. Itu satu daripada sifat Allah Taala. Samseng pun dok (ada) di aku, hanelan (handalan) pun dok di aku, somong (sombong) pun di aku. Kalu (kalau) samseng, aku lebih samseng. Kalu mu jahat, aku lebih jahat, kalu mu somong (sombong) aku lebih somong. Percayaan kito manusiyo kepada akidah nilah, akidah akhirat kito panggil menyebabkan orang Melayu yang sokong Pas ni tidak jahat...'' – Rakaman Ucapan Nik Aziz Nik Mat berhubung isu Allah Samseng, Utusan Malaysia, 31 Julai 2002.

29. “Islam bawah UMNO tidak ke mana dan tidak boleh bawa seseorang itu ke syurga. Berdasar perkara itu, saya percaya penduduk di kawasan Permatang Pasir akan memilih calon Pas sebagai wakil rakyat mereka,” – Ucapan Nik Aziz Nik Mat kepada pemberita di Institut Kemahiran Belia Negara (IKBN) pada 17 Ogos 2009 selepas proses penamaan calon bagi pilihan raya kecil Permatang Pasir.

30. "DAP kalau hina Islam pasal dia bukan Islam. Yang orang Islam tolak Islam itu lebih menghina Islam," – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 12 Ogos 2009.

Dari Blog : Tinggalkan Satu Peluru

Himpunan Fatwa Politik Nik Aziz

1. "Kita bersyukur dengan pendirian DAP sekarang, kerana mereka sudah berubah sikap dan sanggup bekerjasama dengan PAS, asalkan tidak mendirikan negara Islam." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian 12 Mei 1999.

2. "Bukan sahaja dalam menifesto, dalam perlembagaan PAS sendiri memang tidak mengandungi satu perkataan pun untuk menubuhkan sebuah negara Islam, dia (DAP) boleh tengok sendiri dan baca perlembagaan itu." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 4 Ogos 2001.

3. "Terdapat unsur kafir dalam UMNO kerana parti itu menolak Islam dalam pentadbiran negara, UMNO juga ada ciri kafir." - Ceramah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Padang Tembak, Pengkalan Chepa, 3 Julai 1999.

4. "Jika melawan UMNO tiba-tiba meninggal dunia, maka kita dikira mati syahid." - Kuliah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Masjid Kg Pulau Melaka.

5. "Allah sendiri gunakan perkataan memaki, mencemuh atau mencarut, jadi manusia sendiri berpeluang menggunakan maki hamun, tapi terserahlah kepada manusia di mana tempatnya." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 28 April 1999.

6. "Siapa yang nak tolong kerajaan Islam, kami sebagai pemimpin Islam mesti terima sama ada DAP, MCA dan MIC. Kalau nak tolong mengapa kita tolak. Jika DAP ikhlas nak tolong PAS, saya terima. Usahkan DAP, syaitan pun boleh saya terima." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 24 Januari 1999.

7. "Orang-orang Islam yang berkongsi dengan orang-orang kafir untuk memerintah negara, menjadi kafir atau haram." - Hukum Dewan Ulama PAS Kelantan, Ogos 1963.

8. "Islam tidak melarang umatnya mengeluarkan perkataan mencarut dan mencaci seseorang jika kena pada tempat dan masanya, kerana ia sudah menjadi salah satu naluri." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 29 April 1999.

9. "Kelantan menggunakan hasil cukai arak, lesen anjing dan sebagainya bagi menampung kos membuat jalan dan lain-lain projek pembangunan. Arak itu sendiri boleh diminum oleh bukan Islam, jadi bila diminum oleh mereka, maka untuk menjaga keselamatan, kerajaan mengambil duit dari mana?" - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 26 November 1994.

10. "PAS sedia gugur slogan negara Islam, jadi untuk mencari perdamaian itu, setakat mana yang boleh kita hendak kepada Islam, tapi kalau nampak menyusahkan tak apa..." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Harian, 25 Jun 1999.


11. "Menentang PAS adalah Haram mengikut Al-Quran." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Berita Minggu, 24 April 1994.

12. "Saya di antara orang yang cukup kuat menyokong untuk meluaskan keahlian PAS ini kepada orang bukan Islam." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Kota Bharu, 1999.

13. "Para imam hendaklah faham bahawa ada anak-anak mukim tidak mahu menuruti imam yang beraqidah politik suku, agama suku, kerana boleh menyebabkan sembahyang tidak sah." - Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Harakah, 4 Mac 2001.

14. "Negara kita Malaysia belum merdeka lagi kerana perlembagaannya masih perlembagaan kafir."- Khutbah Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Masjid Pengadang Baru, Marang, Oktober 2001.

15. "Memang ada lagi persefahaman antara PAS dengan Malaikat, sebab itulah APU (Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah) memerintah lagi (di Kelantan)." –Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Utusan Malaysia, 27 April 1995.

16. "Kerajaan PAS Kelantan akan mengkaji kemungkinan melarang wanita bekerja. Tidak adil membiarkan wanita, kerana lelaki dari segi fitrahnya mempunyai tanggungjawab mencari nafkah bagi menanggung kehidupan keluarga." – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, 16 Mac 1999 di Kota Baharu.

17. "Ya Allah, aku mohon butakan mata pengundi-pengundi hantu supaya mereka tidak nampak simbol lain kecuali simbol PAS." – Doa Nik Aziz Nik Mat pada 27 Mei 1999 diaminkan oleh kira-kira 3,000 penyokong beliau dalam satu majlis makan malam dan ceramah PAS di Sungai Bakut, Nibong Tebal.

18. "Tiada sebab langsung orang Islam tolak Islam. Islam yang dibawa oleh UMNO ini Islam kacukan, Islam plastik. Macam duit palsu, ubat palsu, makanan palsu. Ini Islam palsu yang dibawa UMNO. Islam ini tidak boleh bawa ke akhirat, tidak boleh bawa ke syurga, dia boleh bawa dekat pintu kubur. Bertengkar atas muka bumi tak habis-habis dengan Melayu sendiri boleh bertengkar." – Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Rakaman Audio di Sidang Akhbar di Pulau Pinang pada 17 Ogos 2009.

19. "Islam bawah UMNO tidak ke mana dan tidak boleh bawa seseorang itu ke syurga. Berdasarkan perkara itu, saya percaya penduduk di kawasan Permatang Pasir akan memilih calon Pas sebagai wakil rakyat mereka (undi PAS masuk Syurga)." – Ucapan Nik Aziz Nik Mat kepada pemberita di Institut Kemahiran Belia Negara (IKBN) pada 17 Ogos 2009 selepas proses penamaan calon bagi pilihan raya kecil Permatang Pasir.

20. "Nabi Muhamad, masa kecilnya seperti Mat atau Mamat, setaraf budak-budak biasa di kampung-kampung, hanya mulia ketika berumur 40 tahun iaitu setelah menerima kerasulan, malah sambut Maulidur Rasul adalah kerja orang tak sudah." jawapan Nik Aziz semasa menyokong Kerajaan Pulau Pinang mengharamkan perarakan Majlis Sambutan Maulidur Rasul.


Banyak lagi 'fatwa sesat' Nik Abdul Aziz, tapi cukuplah 20 saja dulu. Akan datang pasti akan ada lagi 'fatwa' yang bakal terpacul dari mulut Nik Abdul Aziz. Tunggu sajalah...

MUST READ !!! A VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE ABOUT BERSIH 2.0

Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

I received this email from one of the readers few days ago. I copied it here for the benefit of the readers out there. Thank you.

I found this article on BERSIH v2.0 (forwarded from a friend in the UK) very factual, balanced and insightful.

If you love Malaysia, love the truth and hate dirty politics, please forward this article to all your friends.

Regards,

Azhari

Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

The Bersih 2.0 rally on the 9th July 2011 caught the attention of our political leaders as well as the international media.

I am fortunate to be working overseas for the last 10 years. I do love Malaysia and look forward to come back once I have completed my career goals. As a proud citizen of Malaysia, I would like to provide an independent assessment and inject some rational thinking on the current situation.

Many Malaysians who joined the rally on the 9th July 2011 have witnessed the level of unity in rallying for the same cause, i.e a fair elections for the country. There has not been one event in Malaysia for some time that has rallied so much support to fight for one cause.

Whether it is planned or unplanned, the NGOs and the organizers have rallied support from the political leaders (mainly opposition) to catapult this rally to a different level. While the objectives of the rally were apparently focused purely on electoral reform, most Malaysians surely would recognise that the Bersih rally has become – whether rightly or wrongly – political in nature, much like the protest rallies which took place during the Reformasi days of Anwar Ibrahim in 1997. The logic and rationale behind getting 20,000 – 50,000 people to show up on the streets remains a mystery despite the existence of various open and civilized channels. Even more interestingly, the leader of Bersih 2.0, Datuk Ambiga, was granted an audience with the King several days before the date of the rally, which was ostensibly called so that Bersih 2.0 can hand over a memorandum to the King!

However you look at the Bersih 2.0, one has to give all credit to the organizers for orchestrating a successful event / rally, especially in terms of impacting the thinking of the mass population of Malaysians.

On that note, I think there are generally two groups in this country. The first group is the silent majority (i.e those who prefers to stay home and be with their families in the wake of a rally). This group probably constitutes 80% of our population. Most of the time, they are happy to lead their own lives, and are mostly happy with the way things are in Malaysia. There are probably one or two things they aren’t too happy with, but nothing that would spur them to complain to the newspapers or in the blogs.

The second group is what I consider to be the loud minority. These are folks who are perpetually unhappy over the way things are in our fair country. Maybe they don’t like certain policies which have been put in place (and which have likely contributed in some way or other to the current prosperity and success of our country!) In any case, these are the ones who usually speak (and sometimes scream) the loudest on blogs and Youtube, injecting truth and lies and using emotional or racial sentiments to make their point.

While I respect the right of the 20,000 – 50,000 people that attended the Bersih 2.0 rally to demonstrate peacefully, I feel that they were mostly taken for a ride by the loud minority.

If one were to interview the people on the street who came to the rally on the 9th of July 2011 and ask them the question “What are you fighting for today, sir?”, I can guarantee many of them are not able to answer accurately. The majority of those who turned up on the streets are rempits, pakcik tua on the street, people from the village and some unfortunate urban poor people who were given false hope that rallying alone can somehow change the country.

While many Facebook supporters have “liked” Bersih 2.0 before the rally, you can see only a handful of professionals, private sector people, gathered on the street on the actual day.

What you will hear generally are various answers such as “Walk of democracy”, “We want fair democracy”, “We hate the Government”, “Say no to Corruption”, “Reformasi”, “Allahuakbar”, etc.

From here, you can witness inconsistencies of understanding among those who claim to support Bersih 2.0. This is not surprising, since the Bersih 2.0 organizers are rallying a vast number of different groups (NGOs as well as politically-motivated groups) to support one cause. Hence, the understanding and true intention of Bersih 2.0 was “simplified” to ignite more fire and encourage a herd mentality amongst the people.

The problem with the whole Bersih 2.0 campaign is that people forget to really look at the 8 points that the Bersih proponents are pursuing. Most of the people in the street rally don’t even have a clue about any or all of the 8 points and the argument for and against each of them. The whole thing has evolved into a war of perception which is based on a simplistic divide:

(A) If you support Bersih, then you reject corruption and embrace democracy and you are righteous

(B) If you reject Bersih, then you are dirty, corrupt, anti democracy and wicked

Given this war of perception, it is clear that (A) will win over (B) in terms of popular public support. The opposition joined in on (A) and the Government and the EC, including Barisan Nasional is demonized.

When I watched the Youtube videos on Bersih 2.0, the organizers were being very rhetorical about the rally, and why Malaysians should attend the rally. Because Bersih 2.0 has now “transformed” from the original 8 demands into the subject of “Cops are bad, look at this country”, most Malaysians are now fuelled with anger. Nonchalantly, the 8 demands has now been quietly swept aside without any discussion or debate or clear explanation from the present Government.

That is why I would like to return to the original point of Bersih 2.0: the 8-point demands for electoral reform from Bersih 2.0. Let us, Malaysians, return back to the subject. The 8-point demand.

I hope my independent assessment on the 8 demands by BERSIH v2.0 will inject some rational thinking and perspective so that all Malaysians can appreciate the context and content rather than marching on the streets aimlessly without any clear objective or reason.

Lets now look at the 8 demands raised by Bersih and subject them to scrutiny:

1. Clean the electoral roll

 

The electoral roll is marred with irregularities such as deceased persons and multiple persons registered under a single address or non-existent addresses. The electoral roll must be revised and updated to wipe out these ‘phantom voters’. The rakyat have a right to an electoral roll that is an accurate reflection of the voting population.

 

In the longer term, BERSIH 2.0 also calls for the EC to implement an automated voter registration system upon eligibility to reduce irregularities.

RESPONSE:

Based on the CIA World Fact book, death in Malaysia is 4.93 per 1,000 population (based on July 2011). Through extrapolation, for 28 million population, the estimated number of deaths in a year is 138,040 persons. Assuming the information is not updated in JPN over a period of 5 years, on a worst case scenario, the total “un-updated record of deceased persons” is 690,020 people.

According to the EC, we have 11.4 million registered voters. Assuming EC did not update their database due deceased people, this represent 6% inaccuracy of the true / actual registered voters.

Malaysians should ask: can a 6% “inaccuracy / irregularity” (on a worst case scenario) be a strong point to bash the EC or the Government for being unfair? I think this is absurd and politically motivated.

The fact that the opposition won more states in the next GE showed that fair election / democracy is in place.

Therefore, my question for those who are politically inclined: does the 6% translate into a sure win for the the political parties (including opposition) in the next GE?

For automatic voter registration as proposed by Bersih v2.0, many people have expressed disagreement on this subject.

There is a writer who posted something in Malaysian Insider that I would like to share…

“Not that I have anything against people registering to vote. I am a registered voter myself. However, to force something on someone — be it religion, racism and even voter registration — is something I just can’t agree with. It’s against a person’s free will. I see it as similar to parents determining their kids’ religions at birth; performing circumcision on a kid who doesn’t know any better; or even how parents of a male child with no penis would show off their kid in a photo opportunity for the Malaysian media, as we saw in 2009. There are many fears in having an automatic-registration system, primarily on the basis of privacy.”

As for voters registered with a non-existent addresses, everyone knows that we move from one place to another as we grow. Let’s assume that Ali was born in Kuala Lipis. He has an IC which has the address of his family in Kuala Lipis. 20 years later he migrated to Kuala Lumpur, then 5 years later he was posted to Terengganu for offshore assignment with Murphy Oil. 6 years later he was posted to lead a project in Sarawak. Does it mean he has to update his IC address and inform EC every time he moves to another address?

If let’s say 10 million of our population is affected by this, do you think it is practical to enforce it in reality my dear fellow Malaysians?

In short, Bersih’s demand of the automatic voters registration basically forces people to be registered. And that cannot be seen as democracy!

It definite contradicts Bersih’s principles of having a fair democracy.

2. Reform postal ballot

 

The current postal ballot system must be reformed to ensure that all citizens of Malaysia are able to exercise their right to vote. Postal ballot should not only be open for all Malaysian citizens living abroad, but also for those within the country who cannot be physically present in their voting constituency on polling day. Police, military and civil servants too must vote normally like other voters if not on duty on polling day.

 

The postal ballot system must be transparent. Party agents should be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting.

RESPONSE:

According to the Government website, Malaysia has approximately 1.2 million civil servants. The police & military are consistently on duty and geographically dispersed throughout the country. In fact, they are on duty too during elections, etc.

If the police, military are forced to vote normally, then they are forced to leave their duty in various locations. Imagine leaving the jungle, strategic border locations just to vote. I think this is not practical at all.

On this note, Bersih 2.0 also made a proposal to EC for party agents to monitor the entire process of postal voting. Well, this has not happened in any other countries. Please name me one country which allows parties on both divide to “intervene” in the EC processes or postal voting.

Also, postal voting happens not only for police and military personnel who are on duty, but also Malaysians who vote overseas. If Bersih 2.0 wants party agents to be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting, does that mean that party agents need to be posted whenever and wherever there are Malaysians voting overseas? (I’m sure some of them don’t mind having the excuse to have a nice holiday overseas, “in the name of democracy”!)

I think this proposal suggests deep paranoia and mistrust of key institutions in the country, including the Elections Commission (SPR), which I think is simply pathetic.

In conclusion, there has not been any real issues in terms of postal voting, whether in Malaysia or in other countries. After all, from a bigger picture perspective, the impact of postal votes is small compared to the actual votes in the various constituencies.

As a citizen who support fair elections in this country, I suggest that we should be focusing on the actual voting mechanism at the various constituencies rather than debating day and night on postal voting, which, in reality, produces a minimal impact to the election results.

For those who are politically inclined to dwell on the numbers and think that this is still not fair because the postal votes can ensure a better win, imagine this: Assuming 100% of the 1.2 million servants are forced to do postal voting, that represent 10% of the 11.4 million registered voters in this country. Assuming ceteris paribus, if you divide 11.4 million registered voters by 222 constituencies, that is 51,351 votes for each constituency. Therefore the postal votes (i.e 10% of 11.4m) constitute 5,400 votes vs. 51,351 votes.

With all the anger and insult which I hear from the political leaders and Bersih organizers, my conclusion is simple. The impact of postal voting to the overall result is minimal.

The majority swing or “success” for each political party is based on the actual voters who attend, register and vote on the actual election day. Surely as Malaysians, we shouldn’t be so easily fuelled and vortexed into something so small until we lose our logical reasoning.

I ask again the question to my dear fellow Malaysians. Looking at the maths, is this something worth fighting for? Is this what we call unfair election or democracy by the opposition?

3. Use of indelible ink

 

Indelible ink must be used in all elections. It is a simple, affordable and effective solution in preventing voter fraud. In 2007, the EC decided to implement the use of indelible ink. However, in the final days leading up to the 12th General Elections, the EC decided to withdraw the use of indelible ink citing legal reasons and rumours of sabotage.

 

Bersih 2.0 demands for indelible ink to be used for all the upcoming elections. Failure to do so will lead to the inevitable conclusion that there is an intention to allow voter fraud.

RESPONSE:

Less than 20 countries out of 194 countries use inedible ink in their elections. Indelible ink is NOT used by developed countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Singapore, France, Japan and many others. It is used mainly in less developed countries with large populations.

Some of the countries include Afghanistan, Benin, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gambia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon, Mauritania, Peru, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Tchad, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.

It is also worth to note that indelible ink is not a fool-proof method and has its disadvantages such as:

· Indelible ink itself can be used to commit electoral fraud by marking opponent party members before they have the chance to cast their votes; and

· There have been cases in Afghanistan where “indelible” ink have washed off voters’ fingers using bleach; such ink was blamed for contributing to fraud in the first Afghan presidential election in 2005.

In short, if Malaysia decides to use indelible ink, for a country that has a comprehensive database and biometric identification of its citizens, it can be viewed as step backwards for the nation and not a step forward. Remember, less than 20 countries out of 194 countries uses indelible ink in their general elections.

For those countries who don’t use inedible ink, do you regard them as corrupt?

Bersih organizers have really managed to divert the attention of the public on this. Pure deception

4. Minimum 21 days campaign period

 

The EC should stipulate a campaign period of not less than 21 days. A longer campaign period would allow voters more time to gather information and deliberate on their choices. It will also allow candidates more time to disseminate information to rural areas. The first national elections in 1955 under the British Colonial Government had a campaign period of 42 days but the campaign period for 12th GE in 2008 was a mere 8 days.

RESPONSE:

There is no standard or best practice in any countries to determine the optimum campaign period. For example, Singapore has a 9-day campaign period, the United Kingdom has 17 days and Philippines has a 90-day campaign period. The misconception by the public at large is that the campaign period (whether it is 5 days, 21 days, 40 days, 60 days or even 100 days) guarantees a fair election.

Campaign activities must be viewed as an on-going activity by the ruling and opposition parties and not a one-off activity due to General Election. Both parties must work hard daily or throughout the year to ensure support from grass roots and voters at their respective constituencies. The all year round consistent campaigning throughout each constituency guarantees better results than a one-off GE campaign approach. This is particularly true in the modern world’s 24-hour news cycle, where politicians constantly jostle for media and public attention.

I feel that regardless the campaign period, both parties are not privy to the actual General Election dates (while it is true that in Malaysia, the incumbent Prime Minister has the upper hand due to his constitutional role in advising the Agong regarding the dissolution of Parliament, we know that even ruling party politicians play constant guessing games regarding the exact timing of polls). Hence, it is in the interest of both parties (ruling and opposition) to identify winnable candidates and strengthening their grassroots support through regular campaigning. I believe both sides are working equally hard at the grass root level to gain support.

In short, Bersih organizers and supporters should not view the campaign period as a key determining factor to ensure fair elections. Again, they have deceived the public and caused unnecessary anger.

5. Free and fair access to media

 

It is no secret that the Malaysian mainstream media fails to practice proportionate, fair and objective reporting for political parties of all divide. Bersih 2.0 calls on the EC to press for all media agencies, especially state-funded media agencies such as Radio and Television Malaysia (RTM) and Bernama to allocate proportionate and objective coverage for all political parties.

RESPONSE:

I feel this is a lob-sided request by Bersih 2.0. Free and fair access to media has been a hot topic of debate since Tun Mahathir’s time. At the same time, we are aware of the existence of alternative media which provide differing views which are sometimes being perceived as unfairly critical of one side or the other.

Lets look at some facts.

According to ITU (United Nation specialized agency for ICT), Malaysia has 17 million internet users in 2010. According to Nielsen research in 2010, newspaper in Malaysia has approximately 15 million readership (54% of population).

Malaysiakini recorded 1 million visitor in January 2011. For one year, it is estimated the total visitor is around 12 million people. And remember, we have other online news portal such as Malaysia Insider, Malaysia Reserve, etc.

On another data by Malaysian Digital Association (MDA) in April 2011, Malaysiakini recorded higher number of unique visitors at 2.7 million compared to the Star online at 2.4 million.

Therefore, if you compare the mainstream news vis-à-vis the alternative / online media, the equal number of visitors/ readers for both shows equal playing field if you want to view it politically. Why Bersih is making a big fuss out of this ?

Another strong point to note is that the Government does not ban or censor Malaysiakini, Malaysian Insider or any other internet portals must be viewed as a significant step compared to other countries. Despite much provocation from opposition-leaning portals, the Malaysian government has kept to its commitment of free and open Internet since the launching of the Multimedia Super Corridor, and I think the Government deserves a bit more credit for not emulating China in this regard.

In recent times, we have seen the birth of “invisible & anonymous online cybertroopers” whose job is to consistently post negative comments on any article that appear in various Internet portals.

Whilst we all know that these are either planned or posted by a small handful of individuals, we have not witnessed any censorship from the Government on the strings of unintelligent and provocative postings, including comments relating and blaming everything on the present Government.

The silent majority knows that most of the comments posted online at Malaysia Kini and Malaysia Insider are fabricated / scripted by certain quarters. Postings / ramblings such as “Hidup Pakatan”, “Wait for the next GE”, “Lets vote PR”, “Government bodoh”, etc are “recycled” and appeared in different articles.

If we want to scrutinize further, Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider journalists have the tendency to post a negative title to capture the attention of the readers/ visitors. This makes certain quarters feel that the online-media are pro opposition.

So to sum it all, both political parties have equal playing field judging from the number of readers/visitors for both mainstream and alternative media. To allow fair reporting for all political parties, my view is that Bersih 2.0 must also call for the EC to ensure that online media such as Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider practice proportionate, fair and balanced reporting.

6. Strengthen public institutions

 

Public institutions must act independently and impartially in upholding the rule of law and democracy. Public institutions such as the Judiciary, Attorney-General, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC), Police and the EC must be reformed to act independently, uphold laws and protect human rights. In particular, the EC must perform its constitutional duty to act independently and impartially so as to enjoy public confidence. The EC cannot continue to claim that they have no power to act, as the law provides for sufficient powers to institute a credible electoral system.

RESPONSE:

I fail to comprehend how Bersih 2.0 can make this call for “reform” of the institutions mentioned, when the Government has been doing precisely this for several years now, beginning with the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysian Police, the establishment of the Judicial Appointments Commission, as well as the establishment of the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission.

In other words, the transformation of various national institutions is an ongoing process. And so, rather than continuing to lambast and ridicule vital institutions of the state such as the MACC and the police, I suggest that the Opposition and their friends in Bersih 2.0 should start being more productive and suggest concrete measures to transform our institutions for the better.

This is especially true for the Elections Commission. Other than continued calls from the Opposition for the EC to “report to Parliament” (what does that mean, anyway? Who is Parliament should they report to? How would reporting to a committee made up of squabbling politicians be any improvement from the current way that the EC is established?), we have not heard any specific and concrete measures to improve the EC.

Stop hiding behind vague rhetorical statements, and try to be more specific and concrete about what changes you propose to make.

7. Stop corruption

 

Corruption is a disease that has infected every aspect of Malaysian life. BERSIH 2.0 and the rakyat demand for an end to all forms of corruption. Current efforts to eradicate corruption are mere tokens to appease public grouses. We demand that serious action is taken against ALL allegations of corruption, including vote buying.

RESPONSE:

I agree and support Bersih 2.0’s call for war on Corruption. I am totally behind this as no one likes or condones corrupt practices in this country.

It took me several days to study this in greater depth and looking at what the present Government is doing vis-à-vis other countries. I am very passionate to share my findings with my fellow Malaysians who are there in KL raving about corruption.

My view can be simplified as follow.

Fighting corruption is an on-going battle, and I believe each country have to come up with preventive measures to curb corruption. When I looked at developed countries like Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States, it took them more than 10 years to fight corruption to a level where it is acceptable by global standards.

One of my ex-colleague is in a top 3 global investment bank and she had the opportunity to sit in to listen to the Government Transformation Programme (GTP as popularly known in Malaysia) update during an analyst roadshow in Singapore and Hong Kong. From her discussion with many other analyst, Malaysia has placed a number of significant game changer initiatives to prevent corruption and this is clearly reflect in the GTP annual report (which I’m told can be downloaded for free).

As this most hotly debated topic in Malaysia, I did some research on the web to get a better understand on what she meant by “significant game changer initiatives”.

For the first time, a Whistle Blower Act has been gazetted and now every Malaysians can submit a case and his/her identity will be protected. This is something new for all of us in Malaysia.

Next was the announcement of 18 corruption courts expedite corruption cases so that swift action can be taken. I think this is a brilliant idea! Not many countries have this.

From the MACC website, I found out more than 800 people have been arrested for corruption in 2010 alone. And 200 + confirmed cases have been published on the MACC website with names, IC number and photographs. This is indeed a significant milestones for this country if you ask me. I think we are following closely the Hong Kong model. For the record, ICAC of Hong Kong do publish the statistics of the convicted cases on their website.

I also managed to check how transparent the Government is in publishing the government award contracts, I have found this website called MyProcurement. Quite rough but it fits the purpose of listing more than 3,000 government award contracts. Not bad if you think about it.

Overall, although more can be said about Malaysia’s effort in fighting corruption, I feel Malaysia in the recent time has made leaps and bounds to build preventive measures.

At the end of the day, the corruption case may not reduce to zero overnight, but as a Malaysian, we have to give some credit on MACC’s effort.

Coming back to Bersih 2.0. Yes, I do support this demand/request by them. In fact, Bersih should work with the Government to bring the corruption cases along with the evidence forward as they have 18 corruption courts to expedite the matter. Anyone can make vague and unsubstantiated claims about corruption. Why Bersih 2.0 did not bring forward actual corrupt cases and work with MACC or EC remains unclear.

So Bersih should stop riding on this demand knowing the fact that Malaysia is doing everything they possibly can to fight corruption. In fact, stop being rhetoric about such pronouncement of intent. Rather, please work with MACC and bring solid corruption cases ! The public at large are sick of talk and debating about rhetoric stuff and all we need is to bring more corruption cases forward!

8. Stop dirty politics

 

Malaysians are tired of dirty politics that has been the main feature of the Malaysian political arena. We demand for all political parties and politicians to put an end to gutter politics. As citizens and voters, we are not interested in gutter politics; we are interested in policies that affect the nation.

RESPONSE:

If there is one demand from Bersih 2.0 that I like, then this will be it. We must stop dirty politics on both sides.

Politics in Malaysia is still at infancy stage. Fact based argument is often twisted to inject doubt in the society. Racial sentiments are always played to spark racial divide. Personal allegation and remarks between political leaders are often chosen as the best method as opposed to fact based arguments or healthy intellectual debate.

If you look in the last 10 years, the existence of a digital community has changed the landscape on how we think and altered our perception on they how we view a particular subject. More predominantly when everyone can express themselves through a combination of facts, fiction, lies and emotions on the web (i.e blogs, online media), then things start to change. This is coupled with the existence of “invisible cyber troopers” (from both sides) starting to post comments on negative things about this country.

Slowly but surely most of us in Malaysia are now blaming the Government’s education system for our kids’ lack of achievement despite given scholarship, good residential schools, etc. We blame the Government for the high cost of living despite having the lowest interest rate for car loans, property loans, etc. We blame the Government for not giving the rakyat enough subsidy despite being one of the most highly subsidized countries in the world. We blame the Government for not having sufficient investors into the country despite our Bursa Malaysia reaching 6 times record high in 2011 alone, etc.

I hope we do not come to a stage where we blame the Government for climate change too.

On the statement by Bersih 2.0 on “ we are interested in policies that affect the nation”, I managed to do a quick research about the Government Transformation Programme and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that the Najib administration talked about. After hours of research and reading, I almost fainted to count the number of articles and report from financial analyst/economists around the world on the national transformation agenda. Whether it has impact or not, one thing for sure the stock market in Malaysia has record high at 1580 points in 2011. That excludes that the fact the our stock Market has reach at least 5 times record high in 6 months of 2011 !

I mean, on one hand we demand “policies that affect the nation”, one one hand we forgot about the very achievements which are taking place infront of our eyes.

Dear fellow Malaysians, reading and observing how we act as a country, for a homogenous society, we need to embrace and forgive our differences.

We should be grateful. Malaysia is blessed with so many positive things surrounding us vis-à-vis our neighbouring country.

Each of us have a role to play.

Rallying and street demonstration doesn’t guarantee a better future.

Let’s stop the bickering and dirty politics.

Let’s focus on building this country together.

Posted by jebatmustdie

20 Julai 2011

Tuntutan-Tuntutan IFC

Ancaman Daripada 14 Tuntutan IFC Terhadap Umat Islam

1. Seseorang anak yang dilahirkan oleh ibubapa Islam tidak seharusnya secara terus menjadi orang Islam.(kes siti hasnah vanggarama)

2. Orang-orang bukan Islam yang telah memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan kebebasan untuk kembali ke agama asal mereka(murtad) dan tidak boleh dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.

3. Sebarang kes pertukaran agama orang Islam kepada bukan Islam tidak sepatutnya dikendalikan oleh mahkamah syariah tetapi dikendalikan oleh mahkamah sivil.

4. Tidak perlu dicatatkan di dalam kad pengenalan seseorang Muslim bahawa ia beragama Islam.

5. Orang bukan Islam tidak perlu dikehendaki menganut Islam sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan orang Islam. Orang Islam hendaklah dibenarkan keluar daripada Islam (murtad) sekiranya ingin berkahwin dengan orang bukan Islam tanpa boleh dikenakan tindakan undang-undang.

6. Seseorang atau pasangan suami-isteri yang menukar agamanya dengan memeluk Islam tidak patut diberikan hak penjagaan anak.

7. Orang-orang yang bukan Islam yang mempunyai hubungan kekeluargaan dengan seorang yang memeluk Islam hendaklah diberikan hak menuntut harta pusakanya selepas kematiannya.

8. Kerajaan hendaklah menyediakan dana yang mencukupi untuk membina dan menyelenggara rumah-rumah ibadat orang bukan Islam sebagaimana kerajaan menyediakan dana yang serupa untuk masjid.

9. Orang-orang bukan Islam hendaklah dibenarkan dan tidak boleh dihalang daripada menggunakan perkataan-perkataan suci Islam dalam percakapan dan sebagainya.

10. Bible dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan Bahasa Indonesia sepatutnya dibenarkan untuk diedarkan kepada umum secara terbuka.

11. Pelajaran agama bukan Islam untuk penganut agama itu hendaklah diajar di semua sekolah.

12. Program-program berunsur Islam dalam bahasa ibunda sesuatu kaum hendaklah ditiadakan. Program dakwah agama lain selain Islam pula hendaklah dibenarkan untuk disiarkan dalam bahasa ibunda masing-masing.

13. Orang-orang Islam yang membayar zakat tidak sepatutnya dikecualikan daripada membayar cukai pendapatan dan wang hasil zakat sepatutnya digunakan juga untuk keperluan orang-orang bukan Islam.

14. Sepatutnya islam tidak disebut sebagai pilihan pertama masyarakat Malaysia seperti dalam soal pakaian menutup aurat kepada pelajar sekolah.


(Sumber - The Flying Kick)

Surat Kenyataan Balas Tun Dr Mahathir Berhubung Hukum Hudud PAS

PERDANA MENTERI MALAYSIA

YAB Tuan Haji Nik Abdul Aziz bin Nik Mat
Menteri Besar Kelantan

Y.A.B. Tuan Haji,

PENGUATKUASAAN KANUN JENAYAH SYARIAH II 1993 DI NEGERI KELANTAN

Rujukan : MB(KN)(S)16/6/(26)
Bertarikh 8 Jun 1994

Pihak kerajaan pusat sentiasa berpandukan kepada kebijaksanaan (al-Hikmah) yang telah ditunjukkan oleh baginda Rasulullah SAW. dan juga para sahabat baginda khususnya al-khulafa ar-Rasyidun dalam melaksanakan ajaran Islam lebih-lebih lagi yang berkaitan dengan hukum-hukum jenayah.

1. Jalan yang diambil oleh Kerajaan Pusat ini adalah juga berpandukan kepada kaedah yang terdapat dalam sistem pemerintahan Islam iaitu "tindakan pemerintahan adalah sentiasa bergantung kapada kepentingan ramai (muslihat umum)." Penguatkuasaan kanun jenayah yang digubal oleh Kerajaan PAS di Kelantan, menurut kajian sehingga setakat ini tidak menampakkan dan tidak menyakinkan pakar-pakar perundangan Islam yang tidak mempunyai sebarang kepentingan politik bahawa ia selari dengan ajaran dan kehendak Islam sebagaimana yang telah diuruskan dengan bijaksana oleh Rasulullah SAW. dan para sahabat.

2. Sepertimana yang Amat Berhormat sendiri sedia ketahui, KEADILAN adalah ASAS yang paling utama ditekankan oleh agama Islam apabila melaksanakan sesuatu perkara. Penekanan mengenai dengan keadilan adalah sangat terserlah dalam ajaran Islam lebih daripada penekanan yang terdapat dalam ajaran-ajaran yang lain dalam sejarah agama. Baginda Rasulullah SAW sewaktu mengembangkan agama Islam ialah usaha menghapuskan ketidakadilan yang menjadi sebahagian daripada budaya di zaman itu.

3. Tidak perlu bagi saya menyatakan disini betapa banyaknya terdapat ayat-ayat Al-Quran yang menegaskan tentang pentingnya keadilan dan lebih banyak bagi ayat-ayat yang mencela sebarang jenis kezaliman. Disamping itu al-Quran juga sentiasa menggesa supaya dielak daripada terjadinya huru-hara dan Allah sendiri sangat tidak gemarkan kapada mereka yang menyebabkan huru-hara berlaku. Kita hanya bertindak balas terhadap sikap permusuhan dan serangan yang dilakukan terhadap kita. Di Malaysia, orang bukan Islam bukan sahaja tidak memusuhi kita tetapi mereka memberi kerjasama bahkan membantu kita dalam urusan-urusan yang bersangkutan dengan kegiatan dan amalan ajaran Islam.

4. Khusus mengenai undang-undang jenayah PAS di Kelantan, kajian awal menunjukkan dengan jelas bahawa undang-undang itu yang disediakan menerusi perjuangan sebuah parti politik ternyata bukan sahaja menyebabkan ketidakadilan aakan berlaku tetapi, sebaliknya ia akan membawa kezaliman. Kebenaran kenyataan ini adalah berdasarkan kapada keterangan berikut:

(i) Dakwaan bahawa undang-undang ini akan dikuatkuasakan hanya di kalangan orang Islam sahaja dan tidak digunapakai untuk orang bukan Islam akan menyebabkan ketidakadilan dan kezaliman yang ketara berlaku. Memang benar di zaman Nabi Muhammad SAW., orang Yahudi biasa dihukum di bawah undang-undang yang berada di dalam kitab Taurat mereka tetapi kitab Taurat mempunyai hukuman yang tidak berbedza dengan hukum-hukum dalam al Quran. Mereka yang berzina umpamanya, akan dihukum rejam sama seperti hukuman terhadap jenayah yang sama bagi orang Islam. Justru itu tidak ada perbedzaan sama ada penjenayah dihukum di bawah undang-undang Islam atau Undang-undang Yahudi di zaman Nabi Muhammad SAW. Tetapi terdapat perbedzaan yang amat ketara di antara hukuman di bawah undang-undang yang ada sekarang dengan hukuman di bawah undang-undang jenayah yang dicadangkan oleh kerajaan PAS di Kelantan.

Menghukum orang Islam dengan lebih berat tetapi orang bukan Islam dengan amat ringan untuk jenayah yang sama atau jenayah dilakukan bersama amatlah tidak adil dan merupakan satu kezaliman, sedangkan undang-undang PAS akan menyebabkan ketidakadilan dan kezaliman berlaku, maka undang-undang PAS tidak boleh diterima sebagai undang-undang Islam atau secucuk dengan undang-undang Islam ataupun selaras dengan ajaran Islam. Ia sebenarnya tertentangan dengan agama Islam.

(ii) Masaalah kesalahan merogol wanita, berdasarkan kapada undang-undang PAS, jika seseorang wanita yang belum kahwin melahirkan anak maka ini adalah bukti ia telah berzina dan akan dihukum mengikut undang-undang PAS, sedangkan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku ialah wanita itu adalah mangsa rogol. Mengikut undang-undang PAS jika ia menuduh perogolnya, tuduhan hanya boleh diterima sah jika terdapat empat orang saksi (yang terdiri daripada orang-orang yang baik, yang tidak melakukan dosa besar) yang menyatakan bahawa telah melihat dengan terang dan jelas bahawa yang dituduh telah merogol wanita berkenaan.

Seperti kita ketahui, melainkan dalam keadaan perang seperti di Bosnia diwaktu mana orang Serb merogol beramai-ramai wanita Bosnia, tidak mungkin jenayah merogol dilakukan di hadapan saksi-saksi yang terdiri daripada orang-orang yang baik. Jika saksi ini melihat dan mereka tidak menolong wanita berkenaan, mereka boleh dianggap sebagai bersubahat seperti penjenayah-penjenayah Serb bersubahat dengan perogol daripada kaum mereka. Jika ada pun saksi, dan mereka tidak membuat apa-apa untuk menolong mereka tidak boleh dianggap sebagai terdiri daripada orang yang baik, tetapi disebaliknya dianggap sudah bersubahat. Dengan itu tuduhan mangsa rogol akan ditolak dan perogol akan terlepas.

Keadaan di mana mangsa rogol dihukum salah kerana melahirkan anak di luar nikah dan perogol dilepaskan sebagai tidak bersalah kerana tidak ada saksi adalah sama sekali tidak boleh diterima oleh sesiapa pun sebagai sesuatu yang adil, bahkan aia adalah satu kezaliman yang dahsyat.

5. Hukum Hudud Islam bertujuan untuk memberi keadilan kapada semua pihak. Ia bukanlah bertujuan untuk melakukan kezaliman. Undang-undang PAS jelas menunjukkan ketidakadilan dan kezaliman yang ketara akan berlaku. Justeru itu undang-undang yang disediakan oleh PAS bukanlah undang-undang yang menepati ajaran Islam. Ia hanyalah undang-undang ciptaan PAS yang bertentangan dengan penekanan oleh agama Islam yang menuntut supaya menghukum secara adil dan menolok sebarang kezaliman. Kerajaan Pusat akan sentiasa berpandu dan menerima ajaran-ajaran dan amalan Islam dari semua aspek tanpa diheret oleh kehendak organasasi politik yang mempunyai kepentingan yang lain daripada Islam dan kepentingannya.

6. Jika undang-undang PAS yang jelas mengandungi unsur-unsur ketidakadilan dikuatkuasakan dinegara ini, dan jika ia dikatakan itulah Hukum Hudud Islam maka umat Islam dan juga anggota masyarakat bukan Islam akan hilang kepercayaan Islam membawa keadilan untuk penganutnya. Ia juga memberi gambaran yang buruk terhadap agama yang suci ini dan menjejaskan imej orang-orang Islam di kalangan penganut agama-agama yang lain. Ia tetap akan menyebabkan penganut agama lain menjauhkan diri daripada agama Islam dan menyebabkan orang yang berminat memeluk Islam menolaknya.

7. Kerajaan Pusat tidak berhajat untuk bersubahat dengan PAS bagi melaksanakan ketidakadilan semata-mata untuk kepentingan politik dan sokongan oleh orang yang telah diabui matanya. Kerajaan Malaysia yang sentiasa dan terus mempertahankan ajaran dan nilai-nilai Islam tidak dapat membenarkan Kerajaan Pas menjalankan sesuatu yang bercangah dengan prinsip keadilan dalam Islam, maka Kerajaan Pusat akan mengambil tindakan yang sewajarnya terhadapKerajaan PAS demi menjaga maruah dan ketinggian martabat Islam dan penganut-penganutnya.

DR. MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD
15 Julai 1994